@PhDThesis{Albuquerque:2022:PrMéSe,
author = "Albuquerque, Inaldo Soares de",
title = "Proposta de m{\'e}todo de sele{\c{c}}{\~a}o e de
adapta{\c{c}}{\~a}o de requisitos de garantia de produto para
diferentes classes de miss{\~a}o",
school = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
year = "2022",
address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
month = "2021-11-10",
keywords = "sat{\'e}lite, pequeno porte, m{\'e}dio porte, requisitos de
garantia do produto, satellite, small satellite, midsize
satellite, product assurance requirements.",
abstract = "O presente trabalho objetiva propor um m{\'e}todo de
sele{\c{c}}{\~a}o e adapta{\c{c}}{\~a}o de requisitos da
garantia do produto para diferentes classes de miss{\~a}o
espacial com o potencial de proporcionar ganhos em termos de tempo
de fabrica{\c{c}}{\~a}o, escopo e custo, tendo como premissa a
n{\~a}o agrega{\c{c}}{\~a}o de risco t{\'e}cnico adicional
{\`a} miss{\~a}o. Prop{\~o}e-se uma abordagem em que,
essencialmente, miss{\~o}es sejam classificadas em classes de
risco de miss{\~a}o, conforme a margem aceita para o risco de
execu{\c{c}}{\~a}o do projeto, e que requisitos pertencentes a
diferentes disciplinas de garantia do produto sejam alocados a
cada uma destas classes, tendo como refer{\^e}ncia as
caracter{\'{\i}}sticas das miss{\~o}es associadas a cada classe
de miss{\~a}o. O m{\'e}todo compreende, assim, dois
exerc{\'{\i}}cios de classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o: (a)
classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o de miss{\~o}es espaciais em classes de
miss{\~o}es e (b) sele{\c{c}}{\~a}o, adapta{\c{c}}{\~a}o e
aloca{\c{c}}{\~a}o de requisitos de qualidade a diferentes
classes de miss{\~a}o. Prop{\~o}e-se que a primeira
classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o seja realizada por especialistas na
{\'a}rea espacial e com conhecimento em engenharia de sistemas,
para uma nova miss{\~a}o, fazendo uso do m{\'e}todo de
classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o AHP-Sort e tendo como entrada
informa{\c{c}}{\~o}es dispon{\'{\i}}veis tipicamente nas fases
A e B do ciclo de vida do projeto. A segunda
classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o trata da sele{\c{c}}{\~a}o,
adapta{\c{c}}{\~a}o e aloca{\c{c}}{\~a}o de requisitos de
qualidade a diferentes classes de miss{\~a}o. Prop{\~o}e-se que
a ordena{\c{c}}{\~a}o e ranqueamento de requisitos seja efetuada
atrav{\'e}s do M{\'e}todo de Borda, com adapta{\c{c}}{\~o}es
para a finalidade desejada. Este m{\'e}todo permite a
ordena{\c{c}}{\~a}o e ranqueamento dos requisitos de qualidade,
por meio da utiliza{\c{c}}{\~a}o de question{\'a}rios aplicados
a especialistas, resultando na indica{\c{c}}{\~a}o de quais
requisitos s{\~a}o propostos para cada classe. Quanto {\`a}
classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o de miss{\~o}es, prop{\~o}e-se a
adapta{\c{c}}{\~a}o de um arcabou{\c{c}}o de
classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o utilizado pela National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA) para a classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o de
risco de cargas {\'u}teis, com quatro classes. Espera-se que a
aplica{\c{c}}{\~a}o do m{\'e}todo a um dado projeto possibilite
redu{\c{c}}{\~o}es de escopo, custo e tempo, sem que haja
comprometimento dos objetivos t{\'e}cnicos da miss{\~a}o.
ABSTRACT: The present work aims at proposing a method for the
selection and adaptation of product warranty requirements for
different class of space missions, with the potential to provide
gains in terms of manufacturing time, scope, and cost, having as a
premise the non-aggregation of additional technical risk to the
mission. An approach is proposed in which, essentially, missions
are classified into mission risk classes, according to the
accepted risk exposure of the project execution, and that
requirements belonging to different product assurance disciplines
are allocated to each of these classes, having as reference the
characteristics of each mission class. The method thus comprises
two classification exercises: (a) a classification of space
missions into mission classes and (b) the selection, adaptation
and allocation of quality requirements for different mission
classes. It is proposed that the first classification be carried
out by specialists for each new mission, using the AHP-Sort
classification method and having as input the information
typically available in phases A and B of the project life cycle.
The second classification deals with the selection, adaptation and
allocation of quality requirements to different mission classes.
It is proposed that the ordering and ranking of requirements be
carried out using Bordas Method, with adaptations for the desired
purpose. This method allows the ordering and ranking of quality
requirements through the use of questionnaires applied to experts,
resulting in the indication of which requirements are proposed for
each class. As for the classification of missions, it is proposed
to adapt a classification framework used by the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to classify payload
risk, with four classes. It is expected that the application of
the method to a given project will allow reductions in scope,
cost, and time, without compromising the technical objectives of
the mission.",
committee = "Rossi, Jos{\'e} Osvaldo (presidente) and Ferreira, Mauricio
Gon{\c{c}}alves Vieira (orientador) and Perondi, Leonel Fernando
(orientador) and Brito, Alirio Cavalcanti de (orientador) and
Silva Junior, Adalberto Coelho da and May, Jos{\'e} Eduardo and
Yassuda, Irineu dos Santos and Santos, Claudia Celeste Celestino
de Paula",
englishtitle = "Method of selection and adaptation of product warranty
requirements for different classes of mission",
language = "pt",
pages = "287",
ibi = "8JMKD3MGP3W34T/45T5G52",
url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP3W34T/45T5G52",
targetfile = "publicacao.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "11 maio 2024"
}